Award winner: Snap Inc.’s IPO (A)

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

This case won the Finance, Accounting and Control category at The Case Centre Awards and Competitions 2020. #CaseAwards2020

Who – the protagonist

Evan Spiegel and Robert Murphy, founders of Snapchat, which later became Snap Inc. (Snap).

What?

Snapchat is the hugely popular app that enables users to share self-deleting pictures.

By 2017, the app had 158 million daily active users. The Snapchat app remained its core product but Evan and Robert rebranded the company, as it wanted to reinvent what the camera represented.

Snap Inc banner on the New York Stock Exchange

Why?

Evan and Robert took the decision to list Snap on the New York Stock Exchange in a highly anticipated initial public offering (IPO).

Snap priced its IPO at $17 per share – a valuation of $25 billion. Some thought this was too conservative while others believed it too high as the company had posted losses of $515 million in 2016.

When?

It was 1 March 2017 when Snap’s IPO went out.

Where?

Snap is a California-based entity after the founders met at Stanford University.

Key quote

“We rebranded our company to Snap Inc. because we are bigger than just one app…Snap Inc. is a camera company – we believe that reinventing the camera represents our greatest opportunity to improve the way people live and communicate.”
Imran Khan, Snap Chief Strategy Officer

What next?

Many questions remained. How much was Snap truly worth? Would Snap deliver on its growth? How concerning were its governance issues?

AUTHOR PERSPECTIVE 

Making the case method work for you

Marco said: “Since I have a PhD but not an MBA, my first encounter with the case method was as a professor.

“I was always concerned that the way I saw the cases, what might work and what might not work, as well as, the most effective way to convey the main teaching objectives, would significantly differ from the students’ view of these issues. And honestly, I still worry about that with any new case.

“This award provides some evidence that over time I have learnt to see the class dynamics through their eyes. Not without the help of many of my more experienced colleagues.”

Case popularity

He added: “I think this case has been popular for two key reasons. Firstly, it is a new company that many students are familiar with, and the case offers the opportunity to have an under the hood look at the business.

Stocks and shares numbers

"Secondly, there is some ‘drama’ both with the ups and downs of the company since IPO, for example with the stock price fluctuating in response to changes in the influencers’ appetite for using Snap, as well as with a surprising moment related to the IPO, that I won't unveil here but that is detailed in the teaching note.”

Challenges to overcome

Marco concluded: “The case is also built to show the uncertainties surrounding the valuation of an early-stage and unprofitable enterprise. The main challenge was to show all the assumptions needed and the short-cuts used in practice, without having the students losing faith in the valuation methodology.”

THE CASE 

The case

Who – the protagonist

Evan Spiegel and Robert Murphy, founders of Snapchat, which later became Snap Inc. (Snap).

What?

Snapchat is the hugely popular app that enables users to share self-deleting pictures.

By 2017, the app had 158 million daily active users. The Snapchat app remained its core product but Evan and Robert rebranded the company, as it wanted to reinvent what the camera represented.

Snap Inc banner on the New York Stock Exchange

Why?

Evan and Robert took the decision to list Snap on the New York Stock Exchange in a highly anticipated initial public offering (IPO).

Snap priced its IPO at $17 per share – a valuation of $25 billion. Some thought this was too conservative while others believed it too high as the company had posted losses of $515 million in 2016.

When?

It was 1 March 2017 when Snap’s IPO went out.

Where?

Snap is a California-based entity after the founders met at Stanford University.

Key quote

“We rebranded our company to Snap Inc. because we are bigger than just one app…Snap Inc. is a camera company – we believe that reinventing the camera represents our greatest opportunity to improve the way people live and communicate.”
Imran Khan, Snap Chief Strategy Officer

What next?

Many questions remained. How much was Snap truly worth? Would Snap deliver on its growth? How concerning were its governance issues?

AUTHOR PERSPECTIVE 

Author perspective

Making the case method work for you

Marco said: “Since I have a PhD but not an MBA, my first encounter with the case method was as a professor.

“I was always concerned that the way I saw the cases, what might work and what might not work, as well as, the most effective way to convey the main teaching objectives, would significantly differ from the students’ view of these issues. And honestly, I still worry about that with any new case.

“This award provides some evidence that over time I have learnt to see the class dynamics through their eyes. Not without the help of many of my more experienced colleagues.”

Case popularity

He added: “I think this case has been popular for two key reasons. Firstly, it is a new company that many students are familiar with, and the case offers the opportunity to have an under the hood look at the business.

Stocks and shares numbers

"Secondly, there is some ‘drama’ both with the ups and downs of the company since IPO, for example with the stock price fluctuating in response to changes in the influencers’ appetite for using Snap, as well as with a surprising moment related to the IPO, that I won't unveil here but that is detailed in the teaching note.”

Challenges to overcome

Marco concluded: “The case is also built to show the uncertainties surrounding the valuation of an early-stage and unprofitable enterprise. The main challenge was to show all the assumptions needed and the short-cuts used in practice, without having the students losing faith in the valuation methodology.”

THE CASE 

The authors

Marco Di Maggio
Ogunlesi Family Associate Professor of Business Administration

Celebrating the win

Unfortunately, due to the Coronavirus pandemic, we were unable to present Marco in person with his trophy for winning the Finance, Accounting and Control category in 2020.

We are delighted to celebrate Marco's win by sharing this picture of him with his award - congratulations!

Marco Di Maggio

Read the case

Educators can login to view a free educator preview copy of this case and its teaching note.

CASE - Reference no. 9-218-006
SUPPLEMENT - Reference no. 9-218-052
TEACHING NOTE - Reference no. 5-218-091
SUPPLEMENTARY SOFTWARE - Reference no. 9-218-722
Get our newsletter

Stay in touch with all the latest case news and views in our free newsletter, Connect.

Read it online or sign up to have it delivered direct to your inbox!

Picture representing 'Get our newsletter'
Picture representing 'Get our newsletter'
Get our newsletter

Stay in touch with all the latest case news and views in our free newsletter, Connect.

Read it online or sign up to have it delivered direct to your inbox!

Discover more