Product details

Share this page:
Please find below the full details of the product you clicked a link to view.
Thumbnail image for E311-092-1
Spanish language
Published by:
ESSEC Business School (2011)
Version:
March 2011
Length:
32 pages
Data source:
Published sources

Abstract

This is a Spanish version. De Beers' 122 years of strategic evolution exemplifies Adam Smith's 'Invisible Hand'. External factors have created a path dependency for De Beers that has led them to retailing jewellery in 2001. With a need to re-invent themselves after the end of their monopoly they leveraged on their 'tricky' heritage in the jewellery industry. The success of their joint venture with LVMH is clouded with embedded reasons for both parties. Ironically, De Beers' business model has fashioned their largest rising threat- the SRDSIL from India. New players and emerging markets are now chiseling the face of the diamond industry of tomorrow. Questions for the case: (1) How did De Beer's business strategy evolve from Cecil Rhodes to Harry Oppenheimer?; (2) What made De Beers' marketing and business strategy unique from competitors? What were the external factors that shaped De Beer's current business strategy with Nicky Oppenheimer?; (3) How did De Beer re-invent themselves after their monopoly ended?; (4) Does De Beers have the heritage to enter the jewellery market? Justify and analyze; (5) Was it the right move for De Beers to enter into a joint venture with LVMH? If yes, why? If not, why not?; and (6) What is the future outlook of the diamond industry and De Beer? What are your recommendations for De Beers?

Topics

Diamonds; Mining; Jewellery; Monopoly; Ethics; India; Business strategy; LVMH; Heritage; Vertical integration; Legal issues; Emerging markets; 'Conflict' or 'blood' diamonds; Social responsibility
Size:
16,000 people worldwide
Other setting(s):
1888-2010

Access this item

casecent.re/p/108043
View our pricing guide
or to see prices.

Reviews & usage