Product details

Share this page:
Please find below the full details of the product you clicked a link to view.
Published by:
Copenhagen Business School (CBS) (2015)
Revision date:
21-Sep-2015
Length:
19 pages
Data source:
Published sources

Abstract

In the early months of 2014, the Copenhagen Zoo found itself at the centre of a media storm. The Zoo had not been prepared for the massive reaction from the Danish and international community to the culling of a young giraffe, Marius. Two issues were at the centre of the debate: Firstly, why did the Copenhagen Zoo feel that they had to put down a perfectly healthy young giraffe, and secondly why did they choose to do a public autopsy allowing young children to watch? The case addresses responsible management issues in that it puts focus on management decisions made in the Copenhagen Zoo, which make perfect sense to them, but which are in stark contrast to what many members of the general public consider ethical behaviour. The case highlights the information obligation that an institution of the Zoo's nature has towards the general public, and it questions whether this information obligation was handled properly or whether another strategy would have had a less damaging impact on the Zoo's image. This case study has been written drawing on news media sources at the time when the events unfolded. For background information, the websites of the Copenhagen Zoo and the other animal wildlife parks mentioned in the case have been used. This case is part of the CBS free case collection (visit www.thecasecentre.org/CBSfreecases for more information on the collection).

Topics

Corporate communication; Ethics; Zoo; Issues management; Social media; Copenhagen; Responsible management; Culture; Learning; Professional communication
Size:
180 employees
Other setting(s):
February to March 2014

Access this item

casecent.re/p/127618
View our pricing guide
or to see prices.

Reviews & usage