Product details

Share this page:
Please find below the full details of the product you clicked a link to view.
Thumbnail image for 9-708-418
Case
-
Reference no. 9-708-418
Prize winner
Published by:
Harvard Business Publishing (2009)
Version:
28 November 2009
Revision date:
16-May-2019
Length:
25 pages
Data source:
Published sources
Notes:
To maximise their effectiveness, colour items should be printed in colour.

Abstract

Nearly all environmental organizations have a similar aim: to stop the degradation of the natural environment. However, the strategies which environmental organizations choose to employ are sometimes starkly different. Compares the models of two dissimilar environmental powerhouses: Greenpeace and World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF). Active in 100 countries, WWF works with governments, businesses, other NGOs, and communities to set up conservation programs to preserve natural habitat. In contrast, Greenpeace works to campaign for environmental change against governments and corporations and accepts funding only through individuals and foundation grants. Explores the detailed history and business models of both organizations. Includes color exhibits.

Topics

Land use; Social responsibility; Air pollution; Climate change; Carbon emissions; Environmental organizations; Natural resources; Biodiversity; Waste disposal; International business; Nongovernmental organizations; Environmental protection; Strategy; Business models
Location:
Size:
175 employees, USD216 million revenues
Other setting(s):
2007

Access this item

casecent.re/p/85602
View our pricing guide
or to see prices.

Awards, prizes & competitions

2008 - oikos Case Writing Competition - honorary mention

Reviews & usage