Product details

Share this page:
Please find below the full details of the product you clicked a link to view.
Thumbnail image for 717-0072-1
Prize winner
Published by:
IBS Center for Management Research (2017)
Length:
10 pages
Data source:
Published sources

Abstract

This case explores the issues of gender in the workplace, and the deep structures of power that marginalize, oppress, and silence individuals and groups. It helps explore the dark side of the stereotypes, biases, and beliefs in the workplace about women and leadership. The case discusses aspects of the sudden and surprise firing in 2014 of Jill Abramson (Abramson), the first woman executive editor of The New York Times (NYT) in its 160-year-old history. In May 2014, the publisher of the company, Arthur Sulzberger Jr, suddenly announced the unceremonious exit of Abramson without giving any reasons, and thereby attracted a lot of media attention. The abrupt firing raised questions on gender disparity, discrimination in salaries and incentives, sexism, and even non-acceptance of a disapproving look when it came from a woman. The behavior of Abramson, who was known to be aggressive in her communications with her team, her looks, and management style were all called into question; she was even described as having a 'bitchy resting face' and a voice that sounded like a nasal car honk. Abramson did not share a great relationship with the publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr, president and CEO Mark Thompson, and her direct report Dean Baquet, who eventually succeeded her. The issue also reignited the debate on whether women in the workforce, even those in high positions, got a raw deal compared to their male counterparts. There were several questions being debated such as: What should female employees do if they are a victim of gender pay inequity? Are female executives disliked, and even fired, for behaving too much like male managers?

Topics

Gender issues; Leadership; Organizational behavior; Power; Gender pay inequity; Inequality; Discrimination; Bias; Stereotypes; Sexism; Business ethics; Second-generation gender bias; Stereotypical workplaces; Double-bind effect for women leaders; Office politics
Location:
Industries:
Size:
Large
Other setting(s):
2013-2015

Access this item

casecent.re/p/148703
View our pricing guide
or to see prices.

Awards, prizes & competitions

Reviews & usage