Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Subject category: Marketing
Published by: International Institute for Management Development (IMD)
Originally published in: 2010
Version: 31.05.2021
Revision date: 28-Jul-2021

Abstract

This is part of a case series. In December 2007, Korean conglomerate Doosan acquired a portfolio of industrial portable power equipment from US company Ingersoll Rand. The acquisitions, the largest ever done by a Korean company outside of Korea, were part of Doosan's strategy to become a global, full-line manufacturer and marketer of construction equipment. With market leading products under the company's parent brand name throughout Asia, Doosan's senior management expected to re-brand the acquired products using the Doosan name. Stefan Brosick, Director of Global Product Strategy and Ingersoll Rand veteran, wondered whether Doosan would benefit from an immediate re-branding, or if other branding strategies might be more effective. Many key questions needed to be answered before the December 2008 long-range plan presentation: What effect might changing the brand name, built over 135 years, have on these products' market positions? In addition to the name, what other branding elements carried equity in the construction market? How would end-users and distributors react to brand changes? How could negative reactions be minimized? And, if he proposed a phased brand transformation plan, how could he best position this strategy to senior management?

Time period

The events covered by this case took place in 2008.

Geographical setting

Region:
World/global
Country:
South Korea

Featured company

Doosan Group
Employees:
10000+
Turnover:
USD 19 billion sales

About

Abstract

This is part of a case series. In December 2007, Korean conglomerate Doosan acquired a portfolio of industrial portable power equipment from US company Ingersoll Rand. The acquisitions, the largest ever done by a Korean company outside of Korea, were part of Doosan's strategy to become a global, full-line manufacturer and marketer of construction equipment. With market leading products under the company's parent brand name throughout Asia, Doosan's senior management expected to re-brand the acquired products using the Doosan name. Stefan Brosick, Director of Global Product Strategy and Ingersoll Rand veteran, wondered whether Doosan would benefit from an immediate re-branding, or if other branding strategies might be more effective. Many key questions needed to be answered before the December 2008 long-range plan presentation: What effect might changing the brand name, built over 135 years, have on these products' market positions? In addition to the name, what other branding elements carried equity in the construction market? How would end-users and distributors react to brand changes? How could negative reactions be minimized? And, if he proposed a phased brand transformation plan, how could he best position this strategy to senior management?

Settings

Time period

The events covered by this case took place in 2008.

Geographical setting

Region:
World/global
Country:
South Korea

Featured company

Doosan Group
Employees:
10000+
Turnover:
USD 19 billion sales

Related