Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. F275
Published by: Stanford Business School
Originally published in: 2011
Version: 10 February 2011
Length: 15 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

The case examines HelloWallet, the on-line, independent financial guidance service, in the context of behavioral finance concepts. It also looks at the specific challenges faced by on-line personal financial management (PFM) systems. In addition, the case has a detailed overview of American household Finance, including data regarding Americans'' ability to save money, readiness for retirement and level of financial literacy. HelloWallet offers a range of services including personal financial management (PFM), financial planning, a system to aggregate users'' financial accounts, and an application to help users find financial products that are better deals than their current ones. While not the first to market with this type of service, HelloWallet differentiated itself in three major ways. First, it was independent, meaning it did not receive monetary incentives from financial institutions to push their products, nor did it receive payments (ie commissions) when individuals made buying decisions. Second, it looked at over 130,000 financial products to help users find the best products for them, compared to its competitors, which searched through a much smaller number of products. Third, because it was independent, it used a subscription model in which individuals paid a monthly fee. The case is set in March 2010, just after the beta launch of HelloWallet''s Website, and it examines two key questions HelloWallet is grappling with: 1) How to price its product for its two different channels - the direct-to-consumer channel and the enterprise channel; and 2) How to proportionately allocate its resources for the two channels.
Location:
Industry:
Other setting(s):
2011

About

Abstract

The case examines HelloWallet, the on-line, independent financial guidance service, in the context of behavioral finance concepts. It also looks at the specific challenges faced by on-line personal financial management (PFM) systems. In addition, the case has a detailed overview of American household Finance, including data regarding Americans'' ability to save money, readiness for retirement and level of financial literacy. HelloWallet offers a range of services including personal financial management (PFM), financial planning, a system to aggregate users'' financial accounts, and an application to help users find financial products that are better deals than their current ones. While not the first to market with this type of service, HelloWallet differentiated itself in three major ways. First, it was independent, meaning it did not receive monetary incentives from financial institutions to push their products, nor did it receive payments (ie commissions) when individuals made buying decisions. Second, it looked at over 130,000 financial products to help users find the best products for them, compared to its competitors, which searched through a much smaller number of products. Third, because it was independent, it used a subscription model in which individuals paid a monthly fee. The case is set in March 2010, just after the beta launch of HelloWallet''s Website, and it examines two key questions HelloWallet is grappling with: 1) How to price its product for its two different channels - the direct-to-consumer channel and the enterprise channel; and 2) How to proportionately allocate its resources for the two channels.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Other setting(s):
2011

Related