Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. CG3
Published by: Stanford Business School
Originally published in: 1995
Version: September 1995
Length: 6 pages
Data source: Generalised experience

Abstract

Describes the attempt of a shareholder holding a 30% share in a privately held corporation that owns a chain of small dress boutiques to force the sale of company over the objections of the founder-CEO. Alternatives the board and special committee of independent directors must consider include a management leveraged buyout, sale to a large publicly held department-store chain, and repurchase of the dissident's shares at a premium. Addresses the legal and strategic issues associated with the buyout attempt, including the conflict between the rights and responsibilities of directors who are also major shareholders, conflicts of interest between inside and outside directors, and the effects of cumulative voting. The committee of outside directors must decide which alternative to recommend to the full board and whether to resign due to unethical conduct of the CEO.
Location:
Industry:
Other setting(s):
1995

About

Abstract

Describes the attempt of a shareholder holding a 30% share in a privately held corporation that owns a chain of small dress boutiques to force the sale of company over the objections of the founder-CEO. Alternatives the board and special committee of independent directors must consider include a management leveraged buyout, sale to a large publicly held department-store chain, and repurchase of the dissident's shares at a premium. Addresses the legal and strategic issues associated with the buyout attempt, including the conflict between the rights and responsibilities of directors who are also major shareholders, conflicts of interest between inside and outside directors, and the effects of cumulative voting. The committee of outside directors must decide which alternative to recommend to the full board and whether to resign due to unethical conduct of the CEO.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Other setting(s):
1995

Related