Subject category:
Economics, Politics and Business Environment
Published by:
Harvard Business Publishing
Version: 1 April 1999
Revision date: 7-Oct-2013
Length: 31 pages
Data source: Field research
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/103015
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
This is a Spanish version. Chevron Corp, headquartered in San Francisco, manages a worldwide, vertically integrated value chain from the oil well to the gasoline station. Mishandling of oil at any stage of production can damage the natural environment, human health, corporate profitability, or all three. But at the same time Chevron needs to be prudent about the amount of money it spends on measures to manage these risks, and environmental programs within the firm can conflict with a long-standing tradition of decentralized management. To manage risks more efficiently, Chevron executives are contemplating the use of quantitative decision tools that enable operating managers to compute rough benefit-cost ratios for various alternative risk management projects. The case focuses on the pros and cons of using such tools within the context of Chevron's overall system for environmental risk management.
Size:
Gross revenue: $40 billion revenues
Other setting(s):
1997-1999
About
Abstract
This is a Spanish version. Chevron Corp, headquartered in San Francisco, manages a worldwide, vertically integrated value chain from the oil well to the gasoline station. Mishandling of oil at any stage of production can damage the natural environment, human health, corporate profitability, or all three. But at the same time Chevron needs to be prudent about the amount of money it spends on measures to manage these risks, and environmental programs within the firm can conflict with a long-standing tradition of decentralized management. To manage risks more efficiently, Chevron executives are contemplating the use of quantitative decision tools that enable operating managers to compute rough benefit-cost ratios for various alternative risk management projects. The case focuses on the pros and cons of using such tools within the context of Chevron's overall system for environmental risk management.
Settings
Size:
Gross revenue: $40 billion revenues
Other setting(s):
1997-1999