Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Compact case
Case
-
Reference no. CGRP18
Published by: Stanford Business School
Originally published in: 2011
Version: 17 August 2011
Length: 5 pages
Data source: Published sources
Topics: Board members; CEO
Notes: This item is part of a free case collection. For terms & conditions go to www.thecasecentre.org/freecaseterms

Abstract

By many measures, current CEOs should be the best candidates to serve on the board of directors. However, recent survey evidence suggests this may not be the case. Should companies reassess the importance of this criteria when looking for new board members? This case is part of the Stanford Graduate School of Business free case collection (visit www.thecasecentre.org/stanfordfreecases for more information on the collection).
Other setting(s):
2011

About

Abstract

By many measures, current CEOs should be the best candidates to serve on the board of directors. However, recent survey evidence suggests this may not be the case. Should companies reassess the importance of this criteria when looking for new board members? This case is part of the Stanford Graduate School of Business free case collection (visit www.thecasecentre.org/stanfordfreecases for more information on the collection).

Settings

Other setting(s):
2011

Related