Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

This is part of a case series. Part (B) informs students of AA’s multi-pronged strategy for mitigating the backlash following these two incidents. Working with Witeck-Combs Communications consultants, the airline’s corporate communications team met with LGBT leaders to address their concerns, provided more training for its employees, and implemented new policies friendly to LGBT and HIV-positive employees and customers. However, these actions generated criticisms from conservative religious organizations. Part (B) of this case asks you to consider how companies like AA determine the 'right thing' to do when two competing constituencies threaten a company’s reputation, and it asks you to determine what the risks and rewards of AA’s status as a 'first-mover' in the LGBT travel market might be. Finally, it asks you to outline how you would communicate changes in company policies to both LGBT and non-LGBT employees.
Industry:
Other setting(s):
1990s

About

Abstract

This is part of a case series. Part (B) informs students of AA’s multi-pronged strategy for mitigating the backlash following these two incidents. Working with Witeck-Combs Communications consultants, the airline’s corporate communications team met with LGBT leaders to address their concerns, provided more training for its employees, and implemented new policies friendly to LGBT and HIV-positive employees and customers. However, these actions generated criticisms from conservative religious organizations. Part (B) of this case asks you to consider how companies like AA determine the 'right thing' to do when two competing constituencies threaten a company’s reputation, and it asks you to determine what the risks and rewards of AA’s status as a 'first-mover' in the LGBT travel market might be. Finally, it asks you to outline how you would communicate changes in company policies to both LGBT and non-LGBT employees.

Settings

Industry:
Other setting(s):
1990s

Related