Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Compact case
Originally published in: 2013
Revision date: 24-Oct-2017
Length: 3 pages
Data source: Generalised experience

Abstract

This supplement is to accompany the case This case is based on and supports the case Intra-team Conflict Resolution (A). In the business world, the most common and formal communication is e-mail, which is especially useful when an individual proves hard to track down. However, there are problems with e-mailing, recipients may choose not to read, respond or to prioritise what it is the senders are addressing. Also, poorly written e-mails can simply lead recipients to ignore the requests of the sender. Unless the recipients are attracted to the content in the first 2 minutes of reading, the e-mail can be treated as junk and disregarded. This case demonstrates two types of e-mail description that a team member in a conflicting situation requests to push their superior to take an action on problem-solving.

About

Abstract

This supplement is to accompany the case This case is based on and supports the case Intra-team Conflict Resolution (A). In the business world, the most common and formal communication is e-mail, which is especially useful when an individual proves hard to track down. However, there are problems with e-mailing, recipients may choose not to read, respond or to prioritise what it is the senders are addressing. Also, poorly written e-mails can simply lead recipients to ignore the requests of the sender. Unless the recipients are attracted to the content in the first 2 minutes of reading, the e-mail can be treated as junk and disregarded. This case demonstrates two types of e-mail description that a team member in a conflicting situation requests to push their superior to take an action on problem-solving.

Related