Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: Harvard Kennedy School
Published in: 2014
Length: 14 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

Like many other states at the time, Minnesota found itself facing several serious long-term public health challenges in the mid- and late-2000s, including rapidly rising health care costs and residents’ increasing vulnerability to chronic diseases arising from unhealthy behaviors like smoking as well as higher obesity rates. Compounding these challenges, in 2008 a major economic recession took hold across the country, prompting states to target health and human services programs for extensive budget cuts. In Minnesota, even as the recession started to subside, analyses of the state budget indicated that it needed new strategies for slowing the growth rate of health care spending; and in response the state legislature passed a major health reform law that, among other things, aimed to reduce costs. A key component of this law was the establishment of the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP), which sought to reduce smoking and obesity rates - two of the main drivers of a number of chronic diseases and, hence, of higher long-term health costs for the state. In designing and launching SHIP, state health officials decided to focus on developing a close partnership with the private sector. This, they believed, would enable them to combine government’s wide ranging authorities and subject matter expertise in public health with the private sector’s broad reach and its advanced marketing and communication practices and resources. This case tells the story of how leaders of the SHIP initiative worked with businesses and corporate executives in an effort to have as far-reaching an impact as possible. It highlights the mutual advantages of a public-private partnership while also illustrating challenges the two sides encountered as they worked to develop and implement the program.

About

Abstract

Like many other states at the time, Minnesota found itself facing several serious long-term public health challenges in the mid- and late-2000s, including rapidly rising health care costs and residents’ increasing vulnerability to chronic diseases arising from unhealthy behaviors like smoking as well as higher obesity rates. Compounding these challenges, in 2008 a major economic recession took hold across the country, prompting states to target health and human services programs for extensive budget cuts. In Minnesota, even as the recession started to subside, analyses of the state budget indicated that it needed new strategies for slowing the growth rate of health care spending; and in response the state legislature passed a major health reform law that, among other things, aimed to reduce costs. A key component of this law was the establishment of the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP), which sought to reduce smoking and obesity rates - two of the main drivers of a number of chronic diseases and, hence, of higher long-term health costs for the state. In designing and launching SHIP, state health officials decided to focus on developing a close partnership with the private sector. This, they believed, would enable them to combine government’s wide ranging authorities and subject matter expertise in public health with the private sector’s broad reach and its advanced marketing and communication practices and resources. This case tells the story of how leaders of the SHIP initiative worked with businesses and corporate executives in an effort to have as far-reaching an impact as possible. It highlights the mutual advantages of a public-private partnership while also illustrating challenges the two sides encountered as they worked to develop and implement the program.

Settings


Related