Subject category:
Ethics and Social Responsibility
Published by:
Stanford Business School
Version: 7 November 2013
Length: 15 pages
Data source: Published sources
Abstract
On June 27, 2012, the storied British bank Barclays admitted that it repeatedly attempted to rig the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) over a four-year period from 2005-2009. In its settlement, Barclays agreed to pay $453 million in fines and penalties to bank regulators in the UK and US. The media decried Barclays' rate-rigging efforts as 'the scandal of all scandals' and bemoaned the spread of 'Wall Street sleaze.' By late 2012, dozens of other banks did indeed face LIBOR-rigging inquiries by regulators in various countries. This case delves into the scandal, exploring how the rate-rigging worked, who knew what when, and how the blame was laid, allowing students to explore the social and situational pressures involved in the rigging of the LIBOR.
Location:
Industry:
About
Abstract
On June 27, 2012, the storied British bank Barclays admitted that it repeatedly attempted to rig the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) over a four-year period from 2005-2009. In its settlement, Barclays agreed to pay $453 million in fines and penalties to bank regulators in the UK and US. The media decried Barclays' rate-rigging efforts as 'the scandal of all scandals' and bemoaned the spread of 'Wall Street sleaze.' By late 2012, dozens of other banks did indeed face LIBOR-rigging inquiries by regulators in various countries. This case delves into the scandal, exploring how the rate-rigging worked, who knew what when, and how the blame was laid, allowing students to explore the social and situational pressures involved in the rigging of the LIBOR.
Settings
Location:
Industry: