The independent home of the case method - and a charity. Make an impact and  donate

Product details

Product details
By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Thumbnail image for product with reference number 416-0045-1B
Compact case
Case
-
Reference no. 416-0045-1B
Published by: Lagos Business School
Published in: 2016
Length: 2 pages
Data source: Generalised experience
Topics: Human resources

Abstract

The case is in to parts. Part A described the work life of Adam Smith prior to his purported ‘demotion’, while part B described how he built his management style and eventually was promoted. Adam Smith had a very good family background, was a very intelligent person, and secured a good job after completing his university education. His technical skill earned him many promotions. However, his actions as a manager never reflected the fact that he was to manage people in his new assignments. He failed to learn from the feedbacks offered by his peers and subordinates. An unfortunate life event in the company brought out the flaws in his management style. He was ‘demoted’ and this action caused great emotional disturbance to him. Adam was forced by this life event to re-evaluate his management style, and what he could do to improve as feedbacks suggested. By the combination of class room seminar, mentoring, and openness to feedback, Adam was able to improve his management style in a very short time. He eventually regained his lost position (Case B).
Location:
Industry:

About

Abstract

The case is in to parts. Part A described the work life of Adam Smith prior to his purported ‘demotion’, while part B described how he built his management style and eventually was promoted. Adam Smith had a very good family background, was a very intelligent person, and secured a good job after completing his university education. His technical skill earned him many promotions. However, his actions as a manager never reflected the fact that he was to manage people in his new assignments. He failed to learn from the feedbacks offered by his peers and subordinates. An unfortunate life event in the company brought out the flaws in his management style. He was ‘demoted’ and this action caused great emotional disturbance to him. Adam was forced by this life event to re-evaluate his management style, and what he could do to improve as feedbacks suggested. By the combination of class room seminar, mentoring, and openness to feedback, Adam was able to improve his management style in a very short time. He eventually regained his lost position (Case B).

Settings

Location:
Industry:

Related