Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. IMD-7-1818
Published by: International Institute for Management Development (IMD)
Originally published in: 2016
Version: 04.10.2016
Length: 16 pages
Data source: Published sources

Abstract

In April 2015, Shell offered to pay 0.4454 of its B shares and 383 pence in cash for each BG share in a deal valued at USD70 billion. The offer entailed a sizable 50%-plus premium for the BG Group by assuming a USD90/bbl forward oil price. Shell had to seek approval from at least 50% of its shareholders, and BG Group would require the backing of 75% of its shareholders for the deal to go through. On January 8, 2016, Standard Life, a major shareholder in both Royal Dutch Shell plc and BG Group, announced that it would vote No to a merger between Shell and BG at a Shell shareholder meeting to be held on January 27, stating that 'the proposed terms of the acquisition of BG are value-destructive for Shell shareholders.' However, the same investor would vote Yes at a BG shareholder meeting on January 28. A volatile oil market further complicated the M&A decision. With oil prices in the low USD30s/bbl, the market was worried that Shell's view of the future was overoptimistic. Shell top executives needed to make a business case to win shareholder support, which might turn into a case of overpromising and underdelivering to investors.
Location:
Industries:
Size:
142,000 employees worldwide, revenues of EUR125.2 billion and an operating profit of EUR10.7 billion
Other setting(s):
First half of year 2016

About

Abstract

In April 2015, Shell offered to pay 0.4454 of its B shares and 383 pence in cash for each BG share in a deal valued at USD70 billion. The offer entailed a sizable 50%-plus premium for the BG Group by assuming a USD90/bbl forward oil price. Shell had to seek approval from at least 50% of its shareholders, and BG Group would require the backing of 75% of its shareholders for the deal to go through. On January 8, 2016, Standard Life, a major shareholder in both Royal Dutch Shell plc and BG Group, announced that it would vote No to a merger between Shell and BG at a Shell shareholder meeting to be held on January 27, stating that 'the proposed terms of the acquisition of BG are value-destructive for Shell shareholders.' However, the same investor would vote Yes at a BG shareholder meeting on January 28. A volatile oil market further complicated the M&A decision. With oil prices in the low USD30s/bbl, the market was worried that Shell's view of the future was overoptimistic. Shell top executives needed to make a business case to win shareholder support, which might turn into a case of overpromising and underdelivering to investors.

Settings

Location:
Industries:
Size:
142,000 employees worldwide, revenues of EUR125.2 billion and an operating profit of EUR10.7 billion
Other setting(s):
First half of year 2016

Related