Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Compact case
Case
-
Reference no. 9B04E026
Authors: Gregory S Zaric
Published by: Ivey Publishing
Originally published in: 2004
Version: 2004-09-16
Length: 2 pages
Data source: Generalised experience

Abstract

Dr Zidar had filed a lawsuit to recover part of the cost of a building that he purchased for his optometry practice. He asserts that he overpaid for the property because the original owner misrepresented the number of parking spots that were included with the building. The lawyer hired to represent the original owner of the building must decide how to proceed, and whether it is worthwhile to hire a consultant to provide additional technical assistance should the case go to court. This case may be used as a follow up to Lansink Appraisals, product ''9B00E013''.
Location:
Industry:
Size:
Medium
Other setting(s):
2000

About

Abstract

Dr Zidar had filed a lawsuit to recover part of the cost of a building that he purchased for his optometry practice. He asserts that he overpaid for the property because the original owner misrepresented the number of parking spots that were included with the building. The lawyer hired to represent the original owner of the building must decide how to proceed, and whether it is worthwhile to hire a consultant to provide additional technical assistance should the case go to court. This case may be used as a follow up to Lansink Appraisals, product ''9B00E013''.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Size:
Medium
Other setting(s):
2000

Related