Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: Ivey Publishing
Originally published in: 2004
Version: 2004-09-22
Length: 13 pages
Data source: Published sources

Abstract

The importance of responsible value creation is indisputable for society. How could we argue that the well-being of future generations is not important? The disagreement is with the role of corporations in this process. This technical note offers two sides of the argument of whether corporations should be involved in addressing societal issues. The purely economic argument says that a responsible corporation is one which fulfills its fiduciary duty to shareholders to maximize profits. The ethical argument is that corporations are morally obliged to ''give back'' to the societies in which they exist. Using a sustainability argument, this note shows that there does not have to be a trade-off between economics and ethics. There exists a compelling business case for corporations to operate in the overlapping area of our model where activities are both financially profitable and socially and environmentally responsible. Not only does this ''middle ground'' exist, but the activities in this area are likely to generate long-term stable profits and result in a higher level of employee, shareholder and corporate well-being.

About

Abstract

The importance of responsible value creation is indisputable for society. How could we argue that the well-being of future generations is not important? The disagreement is with the role of corporations in this process. This technical note offers two sides of the argument of whether corporations should be involved in addressing societal issues. The purely economic argument says that a responsible corporation is one which fulfills its fiduciary duty to shareholders to maximize profits. The ethical argument is that corporations are morally obliged to ''give back'' to the societies in which they exist. Using a sustainability argument, this note shows that there does not have to be a trade-off between economics and ethics. There exists a compelling business case for corporations to operate in the overlapping area of our model where activities are both financially profitable and socially and environmentally responsible. Not only does this ''middle ground'' exist, but the activities in this area are likely to generate long-term stable profits and result in a higher level of employee, shareholder and corporate well-being.

Related