Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

This is part of a case series. Case (B) provides deeper insights into the Tide Dry Cleaners franchising business model and illustrates how Agile Pursuits Franchising Inc.’s (APFI) entrepreneurial culture and unique values differ from its parent company’s historical roots, established corporate culture, and value system. Case (B) first explains why APFI decided against the investment opportunity presented in Case (A). To explain the decision, both the franchisor’s and franchisees’ contributions to the business model are discussed. The case further explains why P&G opted for a franchising model. Finally, it sets the stage for a discussion of future avenues for revenue and profit growth in an industry affected by changing consumer trends, overall stagnant sales and looming 'uberization' through disruptive new entrants. In conclusion, case (B) offers different ideas for future growth - each with a number of pros and cons.

About

Abstract

This is part of a case series. Case (B) provides deeper insights into the Tide Dry Cleaners franchising business model and illustrates how Agile Pursuits Franchising Inc.’s (APFI) entrepreneurial culture and unique values differ from its parent company’s historical roots, established corporate culture, and value system. Case (B) first explains why APFI decided against the investment opportunity presented in Case (A). To explain the decision, both the franchisor’s and franchisees’ contributions to the business model are discussed. The case further explains why P&G opted for a franchising model. Finally, it sets the stage for a discussion of future avenues for revenue and profit growth in an industry affected by changing consumer trends, overall stagnant sales and looming 'uberization' through disruptive new entrants. In conclusion, case (B) offers different ideas for future growth - each with a number of pros and cons.

Related