Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Compact case
Supplement
-
Reference no. 9A99E032
Published by: Ivey Publishing
Originally published in: 1999
Version: 1999-12-10

Abstract

The third in the AMP of Canada case series (see the (A) case, ''9A99E030'' and the (B) case, ''9A99E031''), this case describes events immediately after the (B) case. Although the project is officially a success, the organization has changed dramatically since the project began. The two key questions are revisiting the same decisions in cases (A) and (B): should the project have gone live, and was it the right decision to implement SAP.
Location:
Size:
Large
Other setting(s):
1998

About

Abstract

The third in the AMP of Canada case series (see the (A) case, ''9A99E030'' and the (B) case, ''9A99E031''), this case describes events immediately after the (B) case. Although the project is officially a success, the organization has changed dramatically since the project began. The two key questions are revisiting the same decisions in cases (A) and (B): should the project have gone live, and was it the right decision to implement SAP.

Settings

Location:
Size:
Large
Other setting(s):
1998

Related