The independent home of the case method - and a charity. Make an impact and  donate

Product details

Product details
By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

This case considers two divisions of a fictitious bank, the Allied Commercial Bank of Connecticut. One of the divisions concerns retail banking activities (credit cards), whereas the other division concerns investment banking activities (trading). Several of the authors of the case have extensive experience with regard to operational risk management in the financial services industries. The data that is supplied with the case is not real world data. However, the distributional properties of the data mimic distributional properties of real world data that had been collected over the period 2008-2012. The main objective of this case is to draw students’ attention to TQM issues in financial services and the importance of operational risk relative to credit risk and market risk. It provides examples of multifactor linear and nonlinear regressions. It also illustrates the contrast between the Central Limit Theorem (and the normal distribution) and the Extreme Value Theorem (and the Generalized Extreme Value distribution) and exposes the differences between thin-tailed distributions and fat tail distributions. Part I (credit cards) illustrates the importance of the Central Limit Theorem and the normal distribution (a thin-tailed distribution) of Ops Risk losses incurred through credit cards. The students here have to develop a control (Shewhart) chart of the operational losses while taking into account seasonality and inflation trends that skew the data. Part II of the case (FX trading) illustrates the importance of the Extreme Value Theorem and Extreme Value distributions (examples of fat-tailed distributions) with regard to Ops Risk losses incurred in FX trading. The final discussion of the case focuses on comparing losses following thin-tailed distributions (eg, normal distribution) and losses following fat-tailed distributions (eg, lognormal distribution) and their applications in practice.
Location:
Size:
50 Billion
Other setting(s):
2015-2017

About

Abstract

This case considers two divisions of a fictitious bank, the Allied Commercial Bank of Connecticut. One of the divisions concerns retail banking activities (credit cards), whereas the other division concerns investment banking activities (trading). Several of the authors of the case have extensive experience with regard to operational risk management in the financial services industries. The data that is supplied with the case is not real world data. However, the distributional properties of the data mimic distributional properties of real world data that had been collected over the period 2008-2012. The main objective of this case is to draw students’ attention to TQM issues in financial services and the importance of operational risk relative to credit risk and market risk. It provides examples of multifactor linear and nonlinear regressions. It also illustrates the contrast between the Central Limit Theorem (and the normal distribution) and the Extreme Value Theorem (and the Generalized Extreme Value distribution) and exposes the differences between thin-tailed distributions and fat tail distributions. Part I (credit cards) illustrates the importance of the Central Limit Theorem and the normal distribution (a thin-tailed distribution) of Ops Risk losses incurred through credit cards. The students here have to develop a control (Shewhart) chart of the operational losses while taking into account seasonality and inflation trends that skew the data. Part II of the case (FX trading) illustrates the importance of the Extreme Value Theorem and Extreme Value distributions (examples of fat-tailed distributions) with regard to Ops Risk losses incurred in FX trading. The final discussion of the case focuses on comparing losses following thin-tailed distributions (eg, normal distribution) and losses following fat-tailed distributions (eg, lognormal distribution) and their applications in practice.

Settings

Location:
Size:
50 Billion
Other setting(s):
2015-2017

Related