Subject category:
Finance, Accounting and Control
Published by:
Ivey Publishing
Version: 2000-02-15
Length: 16 pages
Data source: Field research
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/15673
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
The primary decision is whether Procter & Gamble (P&G) Canada should abandon one or more of the edible oil product lines. The secondary decision, conditional on the first, is the method of production. The alternatives include outsourcing the production to P&G''s US plant in Ivorydale, Ohio, or to outsource to a new Canadian facility which will also produce Tenderflake, the primary competitor of P&G''s product, Crisco. The primary focus is on marginal benefits and costs. (A Microsoft Excel spreadsheet is available for use with this case, product 7A96B011.)
Subject category:
Finance, Accounting and Control
Published by:
Ivey Publishing
Format:
.ppt
Data source: Field research
About
Abstract
The primary decision is whether Procter & Gamble (P&G) Canada should abandon one or more of the edible oil product lines. The secondary decision, conditional on the first, is the method of production. The alternatives include outsourcing the production to P&G''s US plant in Ivorydale, Ohio, or to outsource to a new Canadian facility which will also produce Tenderflake, the primary competitor of P&G''s product, Crisco. The primary focus is on marginal benefits and costs. (A Microsoft Excel spreadsheet is available for use with this case, product 7A96B011.)
Settings
Related
Subject category:
Finance, Accounting and Control
Published by:
Ivey Publishing
Format:
.ppt
Data source: Field research