Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. F1903A
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Originally published in: "Harvard Business Review - Forethought", 2019

Abstract

Research has shown that firms tend to suffer financially when a celebrity endorser becomes mired in a scandal, but the literature to date has offered little practical guidance. A new study, involving 128 incidents that generated negative publicity, finds that firms taking no action after an event - the path most follow - generally do poorly. Its authors also discovered a surprise: Companies that engage with a situation and handle it well don't just stanch the bleeding but come out ahead. The study identifies four factors that play a significant role in public reaction to celebrity misbehavior and provides several clear takeaways for endorsers and firms alike.

About

Abstract

Research has shown that firms tend to suffer financially when a celebrity endorser becomes mired in a scandal, but the literature to date has offered little practical guidance. A new study, involving 128 incidents that generated negative publicity, finds that firms taking no action after an event - the path most follow - generally do poorly. Its authors also discovered a surprise: Companies that engage with a situation and handle it well don't just stanch the bleeding but come out ahead. The study identifies four factors that play a significant role in public reaction to celebrity misbehavior and provides several clear takeaways for endorsers and firms alike.

Related