Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

A positive covenant on a $200 MM floating rate loan required Columbia River Pulp (CRP) to hedge a minimum of $100 MM for at least three years at a maximum rate of 12 percent. The alternatives included interest rate SWAPs, CAPs and COLLARs. What is the optimal hedging structure? Should CRP hedge all of its floating rate debt, or only the amount required under the loan agreement? (This case can be used with two related cases bearing the same name, 9A95B034 and 9A90B036. A Microsoft Excel spreadsheet is available for use with this case, product 7A90B037.)
Location:
Size:
Large

About

Abstract

A positive covenant on a $200 MM floating rate loan required Columbia River Pulp (CRP) to hedge a minimum of $100 MM for at least three years at a maximum rate of 12 percent. The alternatives included interest rate SWAPs, CAPs and COLLARs. What is the optimal hedging structure? Should CRP hedge all of its floating rate debt, or only the amount required under the loan agreement? (This case can be used with two related cases bearing the same name, 9A95B034 and 9A90B036. A Microsoft Excel spreadsheet is available for use with this case, product 7A90B037.)

Settings

Location:
Size:
Large

Related