Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case from journal
-
Reference no. NAC3821
Published by: NACRA - North American Case Research Association
Originally published in: "The Case Research Journal", 2018

Abstract

In 2011, the city of Flint, Michigan, was running a deficit of USD26 million, so the state appointed an emergency manager, who decided to source drinking water from the Flint River. Despite claims of optimal water treatment, residents became ill and complained about the cost, color, and quality of their water. No action was taken until two outside researchers documented high lead levels in children's blood and the water itself. In January of 2016, Michigan's Governor declared a state of emergency and activated the Michigan National Guard; by that time, residents of Flint had been exposed to poisoned water for 18 months. What went wrong? How did mistakes and dysfunctions in organizations, goals, and decision making combine to result in a catastrophic outcome? The case provides an overview of Flint, a chronology of the water sourcing decision, and information about the involved organizations and people.

About

Abstract

In 2011, the city of Flint, Michigan, was running a deficit of USD26 million, so the state appointed an emergency manager, who decided to source drinking water from the Flint River. Despite claims of optimal water treatment, residents became ill and complained about the cost, color, and quality of their water. No action was taken until two outside researchers documented high lead levels in children's blood and the water itself. In January of 2016, Michigan's Governor declared a state of emergency and activated the Michigan National Guard; by that time, residents of Flint had been exposed to poisoned water for 18 months. What went wrong? How did mistakes and dysfunctions in organizations, goals, and decision making combine to result in a catastrophic outcome? The case provides an overview of Flint, a chronology of the water sourcing decision, and information about the involved organizations and people.

Settings


Related