Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Compact case
Published by: Institute for Management Development (IMD)
Originally published in: 2019
Version: 18.09.2019
Revision date: 14-Nov-2019
Length: 1 pages
Data source: Published sources

Abstract

This is part of a case series. Despite 1) being listed as a new darling on the stock exchange 2) an appreciation of the share price of 20% soon after the listing exceeding USD1 billion in market cap 3) a high profile Board of Directors 4) creditable sponsors of the IPO (such as Morgan Stanley), it became a mystery and dramatic meltdown, when the company filed for bankruptcy less than 8 months after the listing. As can repeatedly be seen from the IPO prospectus, it was supposedly a low margin but also low risk operation, because of the apparent diligent risk control of the company. So, what went wrong? The case will describe the dynamics which took place pre- and post the IPO and led to the bankruptcy. It will cover aspects such as Corporate Governance of the Board, ethics surrounding IPO's and prospectus, risk management or a lack of it, Board composition and best practices and not least the HALO effects of a successful CEO and a highly reputable and respected new Board of Directors.

Time period

The events covered by this case took place in March 28th, 2014 - November 7th, 2014.

Geographical setting

Country:
Denmark

Featured company

OW Bunker
Employees:
501-1000
Turnover:
USD 900 million
Industry:
Oil and gas

About

Abstract

This is part of a case series. Despite 1) being listed as a new darling on the stock exchange 2) an appreciation of the share price of 20% soon after the listing exceeding USD1 billion in market cap 3) a high profile Board of Directors 4) creditable sponsors of the IPO (such as Morgan Stanley), it became a mystery and dramatic meltdown, when the company filed for bankruptcy less than 8 months after the listing. As can repeatedly be seen from the IPO prospectus, it was supposedly a low margin but also low risk operation, because of the apparent diligent risk control of the company. So, what went wrong? The case will describe the dynamics which took place pre- and post the IPO and led to the bankruptcy. It will cover aspects such as Corporate Governance of the Board, ethics surrounding IPO's and prospectus, risk management or a lack of it, Board composition and best practices and not least the HALO effects of a successful CEO and a highly reputable and respected new Board of Directors.

Settings

Time period

The events covered by this case took place in March 28th, 2014 - November 7th, 2014.

Geographical setting

Country:
Denmark

Featured company

OW Bunker
Employees:
501-1000
Turnover:
USD 900 million
Industry:
Oil and gas

Related