Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

The Paris Agreement legally bound the signatory parties to take necessary and concrete measures to combat climate change and achieve sustainability development goals. While the signatory Governments did their bit, businesses, too, decided to chip in and contribute substantially. Moreover, there was intense pressure from customers, investors and other stakeholders to walk the sustainability and zero carbon footprint path. Several initiatives were undertaken, but it was realised that until a monetary value was assigned to carbon emissions, desired output would not come by. Thus, the concept of carbon pricing and eventually internal carbon pricing (ICP) came into the frame. While there was an encouraging enthusiasm to embrace ICP in businesses, the lack of an agreement over the carbon price was a major roadblock. Businesses were diverse and so were the pricing considerations. For many, the roadmap to ICP was not clear. There were other issues and challenges as well. In view of these limitations, was ICP indeed an effective and realistic tool to mitigate climate change risks?

Teaching and learning

This item is suitable for undergraduate, postgraduate and executive education courses.

Time period

The events covered by this case took place in 2021.

Geographical setting

Region:
World/global
Country:
United States

About

Abstract

The Paris Agreement legally bound the signatory parties to take necessary and concrete measures to combat climate change and achieve sustainability development goals. While the signatory Governments did their bit, businesses, too, decided to chip in and contribute substantially. Moreover, there was intense pressure from customers, investors and other stakeholders to walk the sustainability and zero carbon footprint path. Several initiatives were undertaken, but it was realised that until a monetary value was assigned to carbon emissions, desired output would not come by. Thus, the concept of carbon pricing and eventually internal carbon pricing (ICP) came into the frame. While there was an encouraging enthusiasm to embrace ICP in businesses, the lack of an agreement over the carbon price was a major roadblock. Businesses were diverse and so were the pricing considerations. For many, the roadmap to ICP was not clear. There were other issues and challenges as well. In view of these limitations, was ICP indeed an effective and realistic tool to mitigate climate change risks?

Teaching and learning

This item is suitable for undergraduate, postgraduate and executive education courses.

Settings

Time period

The events covered by this case took place in 2021.

Geographical setting

Region:
World/global
Country:
United States

Related