Subject category:
Strategy and General Management
Published by:
Ivey Publishing
Version: 2022-08-25
Length: 11 pages
Data source: Published sources
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/186800
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) was facing a proxy attack from Trian Fund Management, LP (Trian) after Trian declared a USD3.5 billion position in P&G, equivalent to a 1.5 per cent shareholding, in February 2017. The fund manager called for a reorganization of the company to improve its performance and for a seat on P&G's board of directors for Trian's co-founder Nelson Peltz. Over the next few months, both parties discussed Trian's proposals, but the negotiations broke down in July 2017, and the conflict became public. Trian announced it would put its demands to a vote during the annual shareholder meeting in October. A month before the meeting, P&G CEO David Taylor had to make a recommendation to the board: should the company accept or rebuff Trian's attempt at gaining influence?
Teaching and learning
This item is suitable for undergraduate and postgraduate courses.About
Abstract
The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) was facing a proxy attack from Trian Fund Management, LP (Trian) after Trian declared a USD3.5 billion position in P&G, equivalent to a 1.5 per cent shareholding, in February 2017. The fund manager called for a reorganization of the company to improve its performance and for a seat on P&G's board of directors for Trian's co-founder Nelson Peltz. Over the next few months, both parties discussed Trian's proposals, but the negotiations broke down in July 2017, and the conflict became public. Trian announced it would put its demands to a vote during the annual shareholder meeting in October. A month before the meeting, P&G CEO David Taylor had to make a recommendation to the board: should the company accept or rebuff Trian's attempt at gaining influence?