Subject category:
Human Resource Management / Organisational Behaviour
Published by:
IBS Center for Management Research
Length: 11 pages
Data source: Published sources
Abstract
The case 'Can Facebook Manage the Mental Health and Wellbeing Challenges of its Content Moderators?' describes how Facebook handled the wellbeing of its content moderators even though content moderation was at the heart of its business model. The case touches upon the early days of content moderation at Facebook where the company hired an in-house team and trained them to screen for content that adhered to the company's content policy. The case then focuses on how Facebook decided to use technological interventions such as AI algorithms to screen content besides outsourcing most of the content moderation task. The case then discusses the various physical and mental challenges faced by the content moderators, especially contract workers. These included restrictions on workplace breaks; restrictions on using phones even in emergency situations; inability to talk to family members about the work; and concerns on better wages and benefits. The case then focuses on how Facebook attempted to address the questions, misunderstandings, and accusations around its content review practices, work, and pay. The case also discusses Facebook's initiatives on training its new content review hires. Facebook provided its content workers with more benefits and supportive programs.
Time period
The events covered by this case took place in 2018-2022.Geographical setting
Region:
World/global
Featured companies
Facebook Inc
Employees:
10000+
Turnover:
USD 117.9 billion (2021)
Type:
Public company
Industry:
Technology & communications
Cognizant Technology Solutions
Employees:
10000+
Turnover:
USD 18.5 billion (2021)
Type:
Public company
Industry:
Technology & communications
Accenture Plc
Employees:
10000+
Turnover:
USD 50.53 billion (2021)
Type:
Public company
Industry:
Technology & communications
About
Abstract
The case 'Can Facebook Manage the Mental Health and Wellbeing Challenges of its Content Moderators?' describes how Facebook handled the wellbeing of its content moderators even though content moderation was at the heart of its business model. The case touches upon the early days of content moderation at Facebook where the company hired an in-house team and trained them to screen for content that adhered to the company's content policy. The case then focuses on how Facebook decided to use technological interventions such as AI algorithms to screen content besides outsourcing most of the content moderation task. The case then discusses the various physical and mental challenges faced by the content moderators, especially contract workers. These included restrictions on workplace breaks; restrictions on using phones even in emergency situations; inability to talk to family members about the work; and concerns on better wages and benefits. The case then focuses on how Facebook attempted to address the questions, misunderstandings, and accusations around its content review practices, work, and pay. The case also discusses Facebook's initiatives on training its new content review hires. Facebook provided its content workers with more benefits and supportive programs.
Settings
Time period
The events covered by this case took place in 2018-2022.Geographical setting
Region:
World/global
Featured companies
Facebook Inc
Employees:
10000+
Turnover:
USD 117.9 billion (2021)
Type:
Public company
Industry:
Technology & communications
Cognizant Technology Solutions
Employees:
10000+
Turnover:
USD 18.5 billion (2021)
Type:
Public company
Industry:
Technology & communications
Accenture Plc
Employees:
10000+
Turnover:
USD 50.53 billion (2021)
Type:
Public company
Industry:
Technology & communications