Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: HEC Montreal Centre for Case Studies
Originally published in: 2022
Version: September 2022
Length: 21 pages
Data source: Published sources

Abstract

In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) had faced the largest existential crisis since its founding in 1948. The directing and coordinating authority for health within the United Nations system, WHO had been severely criticized for its response to the COVID-19 pandemic by several member countries - especially the US. The organization had been accused of being too China-centric, not doing enough to quickly obtain accurate information from China about the new airborne illness, failing to press China for the speedy admittance of a WHO team of international experts, and only declaring the spread of COVID-19 to be a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) at a time and in a manner that was deferential to the Chinese government. Dissatisfied with WHO's actions, US President Donald Trump decided in April 2020 to suspend funding to the international organization and, three months later, formally withdrew the US from WHO. Based entirely on public information, this case gives students an opportunity to reflect on WHO's role in dealing with global health crises, why it was criticized during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, whether that criticism was warranted, and how the organization could be reformed to prepare for future PHEICs.

About

Abstract

In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) had faced the largest existential crisis since its founding in 1948. The directing and coordinating authority for health within the United Nations system, WHO had been severely criticized for its response to the COVID-19 pandemic by several member countries - especially the US. The organization had been accused of being too China-centric, not doing enough to quickly obtain accurate information from China about the new airborne illness, failing to press China for the speedy admittance of a WHO team of international experts, and only declaring the spread of COVID-19 to be a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) at a time and in a manner that was deferential to the Chinese government. Dissatisfied with WHO's actions, US President Donald Trump decided in April 2020 to suspend funding to the international organization and, three months later, formally withdrew the US from WHO. Based entirely on public information, this case gives students an opportunity to reflect on WHO's role in dealing with global health crises, why it was criticized during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, whether that criticism was warranted, and how the organization could be reformed to prepare for future PHEICs.

Related