Subject category:
Entrepreneurship
Published by:
Harvard Business Publishing
Version: 21 June 2023
Length: 17 pages
Data source: Published sources
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/191709
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
Eye-controlled communication device startup EyeControl was founded in Tel Aviv, Israel in 2016 by cofounders with a shared personal connection to locked-in syndrome - a neurological disorder that left sufferers cognitively sound, yet paralyzed, with the exception of eye movement. The team was committed to addressing the frustrations that accompanied the loss of communication associated with the condition. The EyeControl device was reasonably priced, required minimal set-up, and was the first screen-free solution available - thus easy to use around the clock and in any setting, compared with the costly, cumbersome, and complex to use existing solutions. EyeControl initially targeted the home-care segment of permanently locked-in individuals, estimated at more than 850,000 patients worldwide. Seeing the efficacy of their device, the cofounders contemplated targeting the hospital facilities segment, a far larger market. So far, EyeControl had raised USD5 million from startup competitions, accelerator awards, grants, and angel and impact investors. Yet they also realized that their cash needs would be far greater if they were to now pursue the facilities market opportunity, requiring them to conduct costly clinical trials. They would have to seek funding outside of grants and impact funds, tapping traditional VC funds who would be interested in the USD5 billion potential of the facilities market. The cofounders also wondered whether a strategic corporate partner was a potential alternative solution. As they were about to start clinical trials for their facilities product, they were still unsure whether they should start penetrating the facilities market or if they should concentrate all their efforts in the home-care market. Would it be possible to do both?
About
Abstract
Eye-controlled communication device startup EyeControl was founded in Tel Aviv, Israel in 2016 by cofounders with a shared personal connection to locked-in syndrome - a neurological disorder that left sufferers cognitively sound, yet paralyzed, with the exception of eye movement. The team was committed to addressing the frustrations that accompanied the loss of communication associated with the condition. The EyeControl device was reasonably priced, required minimal set-up, and was the first screen-free solution available - thus easy to use around the clock and in any setting, compared with the costly, cumbersome, and complex to use existing solutions. EyeControl initially targeted the home-care segment of permanently locked-in individuals, estimated at more than 850,000 patients worldwide. Seeing the efficacy of their device, the cofounders contemplated targeting the hospital facilities segment, a far larger market. So far, EyeControl had raised USD5 million from startup competitions, accelerator awards, grants, and angel and impact investors. Yet they also realized that their cash needs would be far greater if they were to now pursue the facilities market opportunity, requiring them to conduct costly clinical trials. They would have to seek funding outside of grants and impact funds, tapping traditional VC funds who would be interested in the USD5 billion potential of the facilities market. The cofounders also wondered whether a strategic corporate partner was a potential alternative solution. As they were about to start clinical trials for their facilities product, they were still unsure whether they should start penetrating the facilities market or if they should concentrate all their efforts in the home-care market. Would it be possible to do both?