The independent home of the case method - and a charity. Make an impact and  donate

Product details

Product details
By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

The widespread use of stock options as a means of employee compensation during the dot-com boom, prompted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to review stock option expensing and the setting of a standard for reporting in the financial documents. While the debate has been raging in industry circles, many questions have taken root. Current accounting rules give companies the choice of reporting stock option expenses annually in the income statement or as a footnote in the annual report. Many companies, including eBay report the cost as a footnote. But does this practice amount to a transfer of wealth to the employees at the expense of the shareholders? The case helps discuss the issues and the pros and cons of the expensing of stock options.
Location:
Industry:
Other setting(s):
2004

About

Abstract

The widespread use of stock options as a means of employee compensation during the dot-com boom, prompted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to review stock option expensing and the setting of a standard for reporting in the financial documents. While the debate has been raging in industry circles, many questions have taken root. Current accounting rules give companies the choice of reporting stock option expenses annually in the income statement or as a footnote in the annual report. Many companies, including eBay report the cost as a footnote. But does this practice amount to a transfer of wealth to the employees at the expense of the shareholders? The case helps discuss the issues and the pros and cons of the expensing of stock options.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Other setting(s):
2004

Related