Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: Asia Case Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong
Originally published in: 2004
Version: 23 July 2004
Length: 13 pages
Data source: Published sources

Abstract

This case is part of the Trade and Industry Department SME case series funded by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Trade and Industry Department SME Development Fund. This case gives an account of how a ship management company was able to set itself apart from competitors and from its clients'' own in-house technical and crew management capabilities, by embracing a culture of continuous improvement and by implementing total quality management systems. The shipping industry was not alone in having regulation imposed upon it, but its distinctly international nature made ship managers, as cost-cutting practitioners, particularly open to criticism. A ship management company''s very existence hinged upon its ability to convince ship owners that it would preserve their valuable assets and maximise revenue earning potential, demonstrating that its collective skills were superior and more cost effective. As a result, an effective quality assurance system that continuously improved the organisation''s human and business systems could enhance efficiency and also have a significant marketing impact.
Other setting(s):
1980s to 2004

About

Abstract

This case is part of the Trade and Industry Department SME case series funded by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Trade and Industry Department SME Development Fund. This case gives an account of how a ship management company was able to set itself apart from competitors and from its clients'' own in-house technical and crew management capabilities, by embracing a culture of continuous improvement and by implementing total quality management systems. The shipping industry was not alone in having regulation imposed upon it, but its distinctly international nature made ship managers, as cost-cutting practitioners, particularly open to criticism. A ship management company''s very existence hinged upon its ability to convince ship owners that it would preserve their valuable assets and maximise revenue earning potential, demonstrating that its collective skills were superior and more cost effective. As a result, an effective quality assurance system that continuously improved the organisation''s human and business systems could enhance efficiency and also have a significant marketing impact.

Settings

Other setting(s):
1980s to 2004

Related