Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: Wits Business School - University of the Witwatersrand
Published in: 2003
Length: 28 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

Thomas Bowler, MD of Pipeco, reflected on what had been an eventful, but unsatisfactory, 12 months. In October 1997, with the support of the Chemical Workers'' Industrial Union (CWIU), which represented workers at Pipeco''s plants, he had taken the company into the Workplace Challenge Project - a productivity improvement initiative devised by the National Economic, Labour and Development Council (NEDLAC). But his attempt to introduce this workplace change project had not been successful. One key incident that came to mind was the workers'' boycott of the Workplace Challenge earlier in the year. As far as Bowler and other managers were aware, employee buy-in had been obtained. But when the CWIU''s local organiser arrived at the Roodekop plant on 26 May for a meeting of the newly established bipartite working group, no shop stewards were present. The workers had mandated their shop steward representatives not to attend the meeting. The boycott lasted two weeks. Bowler felt that if he could understand why the workers had boycotted the Workplace Challenge, then he would better understand how to achieve co-operation between management and workers in South Africa.
Location:
Industry:
Size:
Medium
Other setting(s):
1998

About

Abstract

Thomas Bowler, MD of Pipeco, reflected on what had been an eventful, but unsatisfactory, 12 months. In October 1997, with the support of the Chemical Workers'' Industrial Union (CWIU), which represented workers at Pipeco''s plants, he had taken the company into the Workplace Challenge Project - a productivity improvement initiative devised by the National Economic, Labour and Development Council (NEDLAC). But his attempt to introduce this workplace change project had not been successful. One key incident that came to mind was the workers'' boycott of the Workplace Challenge earlier in the year. As far as Bowler and other managers were aware, employee buy-in had been obtained. But when the CWIU''s local organiser arrived at the Roodekop plant on 26 May for a meeting of the newly established bipartite working group, no shop stewards were present. The workers had mandated their shop steward representatives not to attend the meeting. The boycott lasted two weeks. Bowler felt that if he could understand why the workers had boycotted the Workplace Challenge, then he would better understand how to achieve co-operation between management and workers in South Africa.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Size:
Medium
Other setting(s):
1998

Related