Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. 702-013-1
Published by: IBS Center for Management Research
Published in: 2002

Abstract

The case gives an overview of the legal battle between Microsoft and the Department of Justice (DOJ), USA. In 1997, the DOJ sued Microsoft alleging that it forced computer manufacturers to ship Microsoft Internet Explorer web browser with its Windows 95 operating system. The case discusses in detail, the proceedings of the trial, which spanned more than three and a half years. It also talks of the various options before the DOJ and the chances of Microsoft being sued by private companies in the future. At the end of the discussion students are expected to: (1) understand the concept of monopolistic practices; (2) form an opinion on whether Microsoft''s monopolistic behaviour was ethical; (3) suggest the best option available for Microsoft; and (4) list the steps to be taken by Microsoft to avoid antitrust proceedings in the future. The case is intended for MBA/PGDBM level students as a part of the ethics and social responsibility curriculum.
Location:
Industry:
Size:
Large
Other setting(s):
1997-2002

About

Abstract

The case gives an overview of the legal battle between Microsoft and the Department of Justice (DOJ), USA. In 1997, the DOJ sued Microsoft alleging that it forced computer manufacturers to ship Microsoft Internet Explorer web browser with its Windows 95 operating system. The case discusses in detail, the proceedings of the trial, which spanned more than three and a half years. It also talks of the various options before the DOJ and the chances of Microsoft being sued by private companies in the future. At the end of the discussion students are expected to: (1) understand the concept of monopolistic practices; (2) form an opinion on whether Microsoft''s monopolistic behaviour was ethical; (3) suggest the best option available for Microsoft; and (4) list the steps to be taken by Microsoft to avoid antitrust proceedings in the future. The case is intended for MBA/PGDBM level students as a part of the ethics and social responsibility curriculum.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Size:
Large
Other setting(s):
1997-2002

Related