Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Compact case
Case
-
Reference no. 501-034-1
Subject category: Marketing
Published by: Aalto University School of Economics (formerly HSE)
Published in: 2001
Length: 5 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

In October 1995, a food storekeeper in Espoo, Finland, received an offer to rent the fruit and vegetable department of the store and run it as a shop within a shop. The storekeeper is wondering whether he should take the offer, if his main supplier Kesko objected to the decision, and how much rent he could ask from the entrepreneur or if any other type of agreement was better. This case is an extremely useful vehicle of discussion for students in entrepreneurial programs to illustrate the multiplicity and relativeness of the independence of an entrepreneur in a vertically integrated marketing channel.
Location:
Industry:
Size:
Small to medium enterprise
Other setting(s):
1995

About

Abstract

In October 1995, a food storekeeper in Espoo, Finland, received an offer to rent the fruit and vegetable department of the store and run it as a shop within a shop. The storekeeper is wondering whether he should take the offer, if his main supplier Kesko objected to the decision, and how much rent he could ask from the entrepreneur or if any other type of agreement was better. This case is an extremely useful vehicle of discussion for students in entrepreneurial programs to illustrate the multiplicity and relativeness of the independence of an entrepreneur in a vertically integrated marketing channel.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Size:
Small to medium enterprise
Other setting(s):
1995

Related