Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Prize winner
Case
-
Reference no. 300-069-1
Published by: Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge
Published in: 2000
Length: 20 pages
Data source: Published sources

Abstract

This case reviews the criticisms that have been made of Nike on ethical grounds as a result of the employment practices of its South East Asian subcontractors, and Nike''s response to them, and sets these in the context of Nike''s competitive environment. Comparisons are drawn with Reebok, Nike''s main competitor, which has encountered similar ethical problems but has received much less public criticism.
Location:
Industry:
Size:
Multinational
Other setting(s):
1993-1998

About

Abstract

This case reviews the criticisms that have been made of Nike on ethical grounds as a result of the employment practices of its South East Asian subcontractors, and Nike''s response to them, and sets these in the context of Nike''s competitive environment. Comparisons are drawn with Reebok, Nike''s main competitor, which has encountered similar ethical problems but has received much less public criticism.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Size:
Multinational
Other setting(s):
1993-1998

Related


Awards, prizes & competitions