Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. 395-010-1
Published in: 1995
Length: 10 pages
Data source: Generalised experience

Abstract

The case writer has discovered when writing his new book on enterprise policy that another author, apparently, has plagiarised his concepts - interest theory, components of business operations quality. The case provides extracted material from the two authors - original teaching materials and the book with apparently plagiarised concepts. The case is aimed at students and prospective authors, to discuss the etiquette of literature referencing and acknowledgement. It also provides opportunity for analysing the moral and ethical points of view of plagiarism and the legal and copyright issues.
Location:
Industry:
Other setting(s):
1989-1991

About

Abstract

The case writer has discovered when writing his new book on enterprise policy that another author, apparently, has plagiarised his concepts - interest theory, components of business operations quality. The case provides extracted material from the two authors - original teaching materials and the book with apparently plagiarised concepts. The case is aimed at students and prospective authors, to discuss the etiquette of literature referencing and acknowledgement. It also provides opportunity for analysing the moral and ethical points of view of plagiarism and the legal and copyright issues.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Other setting(s):
1989-1991

Related