Subject category:
Finance, Accounting and Control
Published by:
Cranfield School of Management
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/24715
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
A large manufacturer of domestic consumer durables is reevaluating its procedure for assessing capital expenditure projects. In 1965 consultants recommended the use of return on investment. This recommendation had not been implemented and payback was the normal criterion used. This case may be used to discuss the relative merits of ROI, payback and DCF.
About
Abstract
A large manufacturer of domestic consumer durables is reevaluating its procedure for assessing capital expenditure projects. In 1965 consultants recommended the use of return on investment. This recommendation had not been implemented and payback was the normal criterion used. This case may be used to discuss the relative merits of ROI, payback and DCF.