Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

The action of insider trading is examined in its legal perspective—namely, as fraud. The proof of insider trading hinges on several factors, including the definition of nonpublic information, the action of an insider who is consciously trading or enabling others to trade on inside information, and the breach of fiduciary responsibility. The ''test of scienter'' requires the deliberate attempt to deceive, manipulate, or defraud. This note examines several court cases in relation to these factors.

About

Abstract

The action of insider trading is examined in its legal perspective—namely, as fraud. The proof of insider trading hinges on several factors, including the definition of nonpublic information, the action of an insider who is consciously trading or enabling others to trade on inside information, and the breach of fiduciary responsibility. The ''test of scienter'' requires the deliberate attempt to deceive, manipulate, or defraud. This note examines several court cases in relation to these factors.

Related