Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Supplement
-
Reference no. 9-903-034
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Originally published in: 2002
Version: 15 May 2003
Length: 25 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

On August 3, 2001, after a hotly contested proxy fight, Wachovia Corp's shareholders voted to merge with First Union Corp. The managers of the two banks then turned to face the challenges of integrating the two organizations. Their task was to implement a 'merger of equals' that would preserve the best parts of the two former companies while realizing the potential cost savings, operational efficiencies, and revenue gains that justified the combination in the eyes of the shareholders.
Location:
Industry:
Size:
84,000 employees, USD15 billion revenues
Other setting(s):
2001

About

Abstract

On August 3, 2001, after a hotly contested proxy fight, Wachovia Corp's shareholders voted to merge with First Union Corp. The managers of the two banks then turned to face the challenges of integrating the two organizations. Their task was to implement a 'merger of equals' that would preserve the best parts of the two former companies while realizing the potential cost savings, operational efficiencies, and revenue gains that justified the combination in the eyes of the shareholders.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Size:
84,000 employees, USD15 billion revenues
Other setting(s):
2001

Related