Published by:
Harvard Business Publishing
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/41132
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
This is an enhanced edition of the HBR reprint 99607, originally published in November/December 1999. HBR OnPoint articles save you time by enhancing an original Harvard Business Review article with an overview that draws out the main points and an annotated bibliography that points you to related resources. This enables you to scan, absorb, and share the management insights with others. Many companies have succeeded in reengineering their core processes, combining related activities from different departments and cutting out ones that don''t add value. Few, though, have aligned their organizations with their processes. The result is a form of cognitive dissonance as the new, integrated processes pull people in one direction and the old, fragmented management structures pull them in another. That''s not the way it has to be. In recent years, forward-thinking companies like IBM, Texas Instruments, and Duke Power have begun to make the leap from process redesign to process management. They''ve appointed some of their best managers to be process owners, giving them real authority over work and budgets. They''ve shifted the focus of their measurement and compensation systems from unit goals to process goals. They''ve changed the way they assign and train employees, emphasizing whole processes rather than narrow tasks. They''ve thought carefully about the strategic trade-offs between adopting uniform processes and allowing different units to do things their own way. And they''ve made subtle but fundamental cultural changes, stressing teamwork and customers over turf and hierarchy. These companies are emerging from all those changes as true process enterprises - businesses whose management structures are in harmony, rather than at war, with their core processes. And their organizations are becoming much more flexible, adaptive, and responsive as a result.
About
Abstract
This is an enhanced edition of the HBR reprint 99607, originally published in November/December 1999. HBR OnPoint articles save you time by enhancing an original Harvard Business Review article with an overview that draws out the main points and an annotated bibliography that points you to related resources. This enables you to scan, absorb, and share the management insights with others. Many companies have succeeded in reengineering their core processes, combining related activities from different departments and cutting out ones that don''t add value. Few, though, have aligned their organizations with their processes. The result is a form of cognitive dissonance as the new, integrated processes pull people in one direction and the old, fragmented management structures pull them in another. That''s not the way it has to be. In recent years, forward-thinking companies like IBM, Texas Instruments, and Duke Power have begun to make the leap from process redesign to process management. They''ve appointed some of their best managers to be process owners, giving them real authority over work and budgets. They''ve shifted the focus of their measurement and compensation systems from unit goals to process goals. They''ve changed the way they assign and train employees, emphasizing whole processes rather than narrow tasks. They''ve thought carefully about the strategic trade-offs between adopting uniform processes and allowing different units to do things their own way. And they''ve made subtle but fundamental cultural changes, stressing teamwork and customers over turf and hierarchy. These companies are emerging from all those changes as true process enterprises - businesses whose management structures are in harmony, rather than at war, with their core processes. And their organizations are becoming much more flexible, adaptive, and responsive as a result.