Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. 97209
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Published in: "Harvard Business Review", 1997

Abstract

Like economics a century ago, argue Economist editors John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge, management theory today is an immature discipline "bedeviled by contradictions that would not be allowed in more rigorous disciplines." As a result, they contend in The Witch Doctors: Making Sense of the Management Gurus, management theory is pulling institutions and individuals in conflicting directions. Consultant Eileen Shapiro has an alternative premise: Theories don''t pull companies in conflicting directions; managers do. Although conflicting theories are a fact of managerial life, managers are responsible for making tough decisions intelligently, adapting the theories of others as they go along.

About

Abstract

Like economics a century ago, argue Economist editors John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge, management theory today is an immature discipline "bedeviled by contradictions that would not be allowed in more rigorous disciplines." As a result, they contend in The Witch Doctors: Making Sense of the Management Gurus, management theory is pulling institutions and individuals in conflicting directions. Consultant Eileen Shapiro has an alternative premise: Theories don''t pull companies in conflicting directions; managers do. Although conflicting theories are a fact of managerial life, managers are responsible for making tough decisions intelligently, adapting the theories of others as they go along.

Related