Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Originally published in: 1995
Version: 21 April 1995
Length: 12 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

Minnetonka Corporation which was founded in 1964, began as a niche player in the gift soap and novelty toiletries markets. In 1980, it entered - and managed to capture a piece of - the mass bar-soap market with pump-dispensed Softsoap liquid soap. In 1984, the company took on the toothpaste market with plaque-fighting, pump-dispensed Check-Up. This time, success was more fleeting. Minnetonka launched the hugely successful Obsession fragrance in 1985, following up with Eternity in 1988. Minnetonka''s various businesses were sold over the period 1987 to 1989. Analysis suggests that the key is the use of scope - starting a new game linked to an existing game in which rival players are already established. Analysis indicates that rivals may then deliberately choose to delay imitating the innovator if they view the innovation as: (1) sufficiently unlikely to succeed in the marketplace; and (2) sufficiently close a substitute to their existing products. A rewritten version of an earlier case.
Location:
Industry:

About

Abstract

Minnetonka Corporation which was founded in 1964, began as a niche player in the gift soap and novelty toiletries markets. In 1980, it entered - and managed to capture a piece of - the mass bar-soap market with pump-dispensed Softsoap liquid soap. In 1984, the company took on the toothpaste market with plaque-fighting, pump-dispensed Check-Up. This time, success was more fleeting. Minnetonka launched the hugely successful Obsession fragrance in 1985, following up with Eternity in 1988. Minnetonka''s various businesses were sold over the period 1987 to 1989. Analysis suggests that the key is the use of scope - starting a new game linked to an existing game in which rival players are already established. Analysis indicates that rivals may then deliberately choose to delay imitating the innovator if they view the innovation as: (1) sufficiently unlikely to succeed in the marketplace; and (2) sufficiently close a substitute to their existing products. A rewritten version of an earlier case.

Settings

Location:
Industry:

Related