Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. 94111
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Published in: "Harvard Business Review", 1994

Abstract

Institutional investors, who now own a majority of the voting stock of publicly traded U.S. companies, have an influence on the way these companies are run. And given their influence, institutions are under increasing pressure to become activist shareholders. But institutional investors are not interested in the day-to-day management of any portfolio company; their goal is to achieve their clients'' financial objectives. To decide whether and when to become active, an institutional investor compares the expected costs of a course of action, from a proxy fight to an informal discussion with management, with the expected benefits, which are difficult both to predict and to measure. If corporate executives understood what motivates the decision making of institutional investors, they would realize that institutions are not out to take control of U.S. corporations or to lobby for the German-Japanese model of intense institutional involvement. Given the rigors of the cost- benefit test, activism turns out to be the best strategy in very few cases.

About

Abstract

Institutional investors, who now own a majority of the voting stock of publicly traded U.S. companies, have an influence on the way these companies are run. And given their influence, institutions are under increasing pressure to become activist shareholders. But institutional investors are not interested in the day-to-day management of any portfolio company; their goal is to achieve their clients'' financial objectives. To decide whether and when to become active, an institutional investor compares the expected costs of a course of action, from a proxy fight to an informal discussion with management, with the expected benefits, which are difficult both to predict and to measure. If corporate executives understood what motivates the decision making of institutional investors, they would realize that institutions are not out to take control of U.S. corporations or to lobby for the German-Japanese model of intense institutional involvement. Given the rigors of the cost- benefit test, activism turns out to be the best strategy in very few cases.

Related