Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Published in: "Harvard Business Review", 1994

Abstract

Merck''s acquisition of Medco Containment Services in November 1993 set off a wave of controversial mergers between pharmaceutical companies and prescription-benefits-management companies. Drug-company executives argue that PBMs can provide valuable information about the way drugs are prescribed and used. But critics of the mergers question the PBMs'' practice of offering incentives to retail pharmacists who persuade physicians to prescribe certain drugs. Critics also speculate that aggressive growth of acquired PBMs contributes to price competition, which may decrease profits and incentives for new-drug research. The PBM acquisitions are attempts to confront profound changes in the industry, but does ownership of PBMs create competitive advantage? Proponents of the mergers argue that a PBM can provide a pharmaceutical company with superior information, better access to customers, and the opportunity to introduce new products, such as capitation and disease management. But before drug companies can fully exploit the potential of alliances with PBMs, they face enormous challenges, including an environment that may favor less investment in R&D and important ethical and legal questions.

About

Abstract

Merck''s acquisition of Medco Containment Services in November 1993 set off a wave of controversial mergers between pharmaceutical companies and prescription-benefits-management companies. Drug-company executives argue that PBMs can provide valuable information about the way drugs are prescribed and used. But critics of the mergers question the PBMs'' practice of offering incentives to retail pharmacists who persuade physicians to prescribe certain drugs. Critics also speculate that aggressive growth of acquired PBMs contributes to price competition, which may decrease profits and incentives for new-drug research. The PBM acquisitions are attempts to confront profound changes in the industry, but does ownership of PBMs create competitive advantage? Proponents of the mergers argue that a PBM can provide a pharmaceutical company with superior information, better access to customers, and the opportunity to introduce new products, such as capitation and disease management. But before drug companies can fully exploit the potential of alliances with PBMs, they face enormous challenges, including an environment that may favor less investment in R&D and important ethical and legal questions.

Related