The independent home of the case method - and a charity. Make an impact and  donate

Product details

Product details
By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Thumbnail image for product with reference number 9-391-170
Compact case
Supplement
-
Reference no. 9-391-170
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Originally published in: 1991
Version: 27 July 2001

Abstract

Describes the reasons why the courts found in favor of Ann Hopkins in the sexual discrimination suit. Also explains why the courts concluded she was the victim of sexual stereotyping.

About

Abstract

Describes the reasons why the courts found in favor of Ann Hopkins in the sexual discrimination suit. Also explains why the courts concluded she was the victim of sexual stereotyping.

Settings


Related