Ann Hopkins (B) - The Case Centre

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Compact case

Supplement

Reference no. 9-391-170

Subject category: Ethics and Social Responsibility

Authors: Joseph L Badaracco (Harvard Business School); Ilyse Barkan (Harvard Business School)

Published by: Harvard Business Publishing

Originally published in: 1991

Version: 27 July 2001

Length: 2 pages

Data source: Published sources

Topics: Commercial banks; Databases; Business Law; Business ethics; Diversity; Women; Discrimination; Gender discrimination; Hiring & employment

Share a link: https://casecent.re/p/46161

| No reviews for this item

This product has not been used yet

View our pricing guide or login to see prices.

Abstract

Describes the reasons why the courts found in favor of Ann Hopkins in the sexual discrimination suit. Also explains why the courts concluded she was the victim of sexual stereotyping.

Industry:

Apparel accessories

About

Abstract

Describes the reasons why the courts found in favor of Ann Hopkins in the sexual discrimination suit. Also explains why the courts concluded she was the victim of sexual stereotyping.