Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. 92302
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Published in: "Harvard Business Review", 1992
Length: 8 pages

Abstract

Media critics charge that CEOs with outrageous salaries are running U.S. corporations into the ground. Politicians claim overpaid CEOs are the root cause of the U.S. competitiveness problem. Add a recessionary business climate to the fact that some CEOs earn 130 times more than their lowest paid employees and you have the makings of a populist rebellion. Most U.S. corporations use stock compensation to link company long-term performance to executive salaries. Rather than cut executive pay, corporations should extend incentive-based compensation plans to all employees, thus narrowing the salary gap and establishing pay-for- performance at every level of the organization.

About

Abstract

Media critics charge that CEOs with outrageous salaries are running U.S. corporations into the ground. Politicians claim overpaid CEOs are the root cause of the U.S. competitiveness problem. Add a recessionary business climate to the fact that some CEOs earn 130 times more than their lowest paid employees and you have the makings of a populist rebellion. Most U.S. corporations use stock compensation to link company long-term performance to executive salaries. Rather than cut executive pay, corporations should extend incentive-based compensation plans to all employees, thus narrowing the salary gap and establishing pay-for- performance at every level of the organization.

Related