Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. 9-390-212
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Originally published in: 1990
Version: 31 October 1991
Length: 7 pages
Data source: Published sources
Topics: Ethics

Abstract

Presents a classic dilemma in legal ethics - the conflict between an attorney's obligations as an attorney, in this case to protect a client's confidentiality, and his or her own moral obligations as a person. An attorney must decide how to respond to the father of a missing young woman who has asked for information about her whereabouts. The attorney knows from conversations with his client that the young woman is dead and where her body is. Shows students what role-related obligations are, why they have strong moral claims, and the difficult dilemmas role obligations can create.
Location:
Industry:
Size:
Small
Other setting(s):
1976

About

Abstract

Presents a classic dilemma in legal ethics - the conflict between an attorney's obligations as an attorney, in this case to protect a client's confidentiality, and his or her own moral obligations as a person. An attorney must decide how to respond to the father of a missing young woman who has asked for information about her whereabouts. The attorney knows from conversations with his client that the young woman is dead and where her body is. Shows students what role-related obligations are, why they have strong moral claims, and the difficult dilemmas role obligations can create.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Size:
Small
Other setting(s):
1976

Related