Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. 90308
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Published in: "Harvard Business Review", 1990

Abstract

Attention to how much CEOs are paid diverts public attention from how they are paid. A statistical analysis of executive compensation concludes that top executives are not receiving record salaries and bonuses; annual changes in executive compensation do not reflect changes in corporate performance; and with respect to pay for performance, CEO compensation is getting worse. Compensation policy not only shapes how top executives behave, it also helps determine the kind of executives an organization attracts. Boards of directors must reform their compensation practices and adopt systems that reward outstanding performance and penalize poor performance.

About

Abstract

Attention to how much CEOs are paid diverts public attention from how they are paid. A statistical analysis of executive compensation concludes that top executives are not receiving record salaries and bonuses; annual changes in executive compensation do not reflect changes in corporate performance; and with respect to pay for performance, CEO compensation is getting worse. Compensation policy not only shapes how top executives behave, it also helps determine the kind of executives an organization attracts. Boards of directors must reform their compensation practices and adopt systems that reward outstanding performance and penalize poor performance.

Related